Post by radioguy"as my 1st msg states - the cops gave me
orders, never asked me anything - i told
them i had the paperwork, and where i
got it... and they took my radio from
me... never lied to them - never tried
to hid anything... i was talking on a
GMRS channel, which i am licensed to by
the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT...and i kept
talking on it even though the cops
were driving by... when they finally
stopped where i was - i was still
talking - did not try to hide anything... ".
"<b>When i was in front of my building
- I was on PRIVATE PROPERTY, not on the
city property... this is another
factor that pisses me off</ b>"
BG > anyone who is pissed off by having his/her
BG > constitutional rights violated today, is
BG > in for an early heart attack. The liberals
BG > are fast deep sixing the document......
BG > If you don't want that to happen, they you
BG > [had] better start doing something about it.
BG > Staying silent is going basckward.
BG > You are either for it or against it.
Bill Graham:
On usenet, misfits, Aspergers Syndrome,
Disability cases and LIBERAL politics dominate.
The lunatics run the asylum.
They see Constitutionalists as nut cases.
You're preaching to the other sides' choir, Bill.
I don't think the Fabian "gradual socialists"
are quite ready to cast off their sheeps clothing
(as in their wolf in sheeps clothing crest)
and admit they are against the US Constitution.
Their motto (with the tortoise logo) asserts they
will "strike hard" some day, but I suspect
they aren't quite ready for their
"end game" scenario.
It's possible though.
Greg Hanson, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Loading Image...
Loading Image...
http://libertywriter.com/jmrodkey/2011/08/14/the-fabian-society-and-its-war-on-america/
The Fabian Society and its War On America
Posted on August 14, 2011 by jmrodkey
The Fabian Society and its War on America.
Today we hear a great deal about Progressives in America but fully
understanding Progressivism begins through the exploration of its
roots and those roots begin in The Fabian Society. The Fabian Society
began in England in 1887 by a relatively small group of intellectual
elitists who embraced Marxist Socialism forced upon a society through
slow gradual and incremental steps. The logo (pictured above) is a
symbol of the Fabian Society. One should immediately questions why an
organization would consider using a shield that pictures a wolf in
sheep’s clothing as an image to promote their beliefs and the answer
should be an obvious one. It is the arrogance of the intellectual
elite. More importantly though should be the question “If they are
the wolf, who are the sheep?”
The gradual transition to a Marxist Socialist regime is also
represented in another image popular with Fabian Socialists.
The Fabian’s gave this gradual change a policy directive. They called
it: “The Doctrine of Inevability of Gradulaism”
This doctrine established that “without breach of continuity or abrupt
change of the entire social issue,” by infiltrating educational
institutions, government agencies, and political parties. Prominent
Fabian and writer, George Bernard Shaw, revealed that their goal was
to be achieved by “stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of
never calling socialism by its right name.”
George Bernard Shaw was a beloved satirist in England who is still
noted for his wit and in educational circles, some of that wit is
carefully concealed although Shaw himself never concealed his intent.
“I don’t want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number
of people who I might want to kill…I think it would be a good thing to
make everybody come before a properly appointed board just as he might
come before the income tax commissioner and say every 5 years or every
7 years…just put them there and say , ‘Sir or madam will you be kind
enough to justify your existence…if you’re not producing as much as
you consume or perhaps a little bit more then clearly we cannot use
the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you
alive. Because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very
much use to yourself.’
-George Bernard Shaw
This is the core of Eugenics, or the philosophy of applied science or
the bio-social movement which advocates the use of practices aimed at
improving the genetic composition of a population, usually referring
to human populations.
Shaw also said “A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an
extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would simply
have to be put out of existence simply because its wastes other
peoples time to look at them”
Shaw is calling for the program implemented by Germany to purge its
society of those the government deemed drains upon their society.
Shaw’s principles put into action gave birth to the gas chambers in
Nazi Germany.
One principle the Fabians fully grasped was that to fundamentally
transform Society it would be necessary to move that Society towards a
Welfare State. In order to accomplish this they understood that they
had to change the dialogue to focus on the weaknesses in human nature
in order to gain sympathy and popularity for this cause. If they
could manipulate societies, preying upon poor to use them to advance
their causes, while at the same time preying upon the human nature by
making them feel guilty and responsible for the condition of the poor
they could accomplish the second phase of their goals.
The second phase is to replace Free Market Capitalism with State
Capitalism. They believed that State should control aspects of
business such as electric power production, transportation, precious
metals and of course, credit. The remaining balance of economic
systems would be left to the private sector however; it, in their
thinking, must be highly regulated by the State and operated according
to the wishes of the State.
There is nothing tolerant about the Fabian Socialist, they are and
were statists. The long term goal was to delude the populace into
believe that Democracy and Socialism were compatible while pushing
towards a Socialistic Dictatorship through a legalistic view of
morality where the individual is simply a part of a greater
collective. No individual has any worth except the worth that
individual provides to the collective. If the collective does not
benefit from the individual than that individual has absolutely no
worth.
It is obvious that Adolph Hitler yields what happens when this model
is put in to practical purpose. The only difference between the
Fabian Society and Hitler was that they believed he moved to fast for
society to accept their goals.
The philosophy was embraced by intellectual elitists in America.
Knowing that Socialist meant Communist in the average American mind
and Communism was a known enemy of American Values, they could not
identify themselves as being openly Socialist so they called
themselves something different. They used the word Progressive.
It was essential that, in order to establish global dominance through
a world dictatorship, the principle of American Exceptionalism must
fail. In less than 100 years America had gone from being an upstart
new Government to the leader of the principles of freedom and
individual liberties and that this had given birth to an
entrepreneurial spirit that had made the American dollar the standard
of measurement for the value of world currency.
To the pure Socialist, this is unthinkable and unacceptable. This does
not exemplify their collective will. The free-market ideology must be
forced to collapse. If society was to be purged from the
undesirables, a system had to come into place that would replace the
free market individualism to remove competition from the largest
corporation while at the same time regulating those large corporations
to comply with a word governance ideology. They could not have
competition; they must regulate to create the level playing field.
In order to accomplish this the conversion of America from the
viewpoint of free market Capitalism to State Capitalism, something had
to be done to collapse American economy from a market that could
function prosperously without Government interference into a country
that would become dependent upon the government in order to maintain
its power that would be equally beneficial to both the Corporate power
structure and the Government.
At the same time, the Government needed to replace the spirit of
entrepreneurialism of the individual with a Welfare State of
dependency. This would call for a dramatic shift of the paradigm
within the realm of the intellectually elite in this country. In the
most daring strategy of the Fabian Progressive movement, the spirit of
Charity through moral conviction of the individual had to be replaced
with the mandated theft of monies to create a dependent society in
what Hayak referred to as the Road to Serfdom.
The wolf needed to identify the flock that it was going to feed upon
in order to accomplish that aim and this task fell upon Margaret
Sanger.
Margaret Sanger, the mother/founder of Planned Parenthood who has
successfully deceived the masses into embracing them as holding
compassion for the poor, made her intentions clear but few then and
now listened to her intent. Modern Progressives seek to hide what
Sanger said in public because in this politically correct world, the
real heart and spirit of her words betray the aims and goals of the
image Planned Parenthood had fabricated for themselves. Consider
these three quotes from Sanger.
“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying …
demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism …
[Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of
the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate
fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must
agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming
to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the
race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree
dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of
an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who
never should have been born at all.”
“Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution
of racial, political and social problems”
“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant
members is to kill it.”
To implement this Eugenic Control of Society, the wolf recognized the
sheep it needed to devour. Again, quoting from Margaret Sanger:
“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with
social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most
successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious
appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate
the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten
out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious
members.”
Sanger’s ideology was radical for its time and the fact that so many
of her supporters choose to ignore these statements from her
demonstrates that her direct attempts at the Eugenic destruction of
the black race and those that were identified as the social morons and
dredges of society by the intellectually elite was never realized.
That is not to say it was not tried. Through Sanger’s progressive
ideology several states adopted a forced sterilization program that
resulted in in the sterilization of an estimated 60,000 Americans.
The concept of the turtle moving slowly replaced Sanger’s radical
Hitleresque destruction of classes that was deemed non-productive
towards meeting the Fabian ends.
In order to replace entrepreneurialism the first step had to be to
find a way to remove the competition of the free market system by
replacing it with a governmentally controlled economic standard.
Enter the Federal Reserve.
While the excuse of a depression was its impetus, the goal of its
establishment is evidenced in its results. The Federal Reserve could
now control and regulate Wall Street through economic manipulations in
implementation of interest rates, securities and bonds. The
Authority of the Federal Reserve, while supposedly separate from the
powers of Congress, falls under an appointed office through the
Presidency effectively now giving the President some control over
market fluctuations and pricing.
A new way of manipulating the market had to be developed and this fell
to a man named John Maynard Keynes
Keynes stated “Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to
destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency. By a
continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly
and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By
this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily;
and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.
The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only
at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing
distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls,
beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires,
become ‘profiteers,’ who are the object of the hatred of the
bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of
the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the
currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent
relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate
foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost
meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a
gamble and a lottery.”
This new philosophy of economics is now referred to as Keynesian and
is the only method of economics that the liberal progressives embrace
in spite of its continual and historic evidence of complete failures.
The economic manipulations of the Federal Reserve were not enough
though. The President’s powers had to be extended to other
institutions and this was realized through FDR’s New Deal. The New
Deal was the brainchild of a man named Stuart Chase. Stuart Chase was
a member of the Fabian Society at Harvard University.
He laid out the basis of the New Deal. The New Deal would empower the
President through newly created agencies run by appointed positions to
manipulate the government’s regulations of the business world
effectively choosing which companies would fail and which would
succeed through fees, duties and regulations.
The New Deal was only Stuarts short term goals. The long term goals
were established in 1942 through a book he wrote entitled “The Road We
Are Traveling”. In it he laid out the Fabian/Progressive plan for the
future of America
1.A strong, centralized government.
2.An executive arm growing at the expense of the legislative and
judicial arms.
3.The control of banking, credit and security exchanges by the
government.
4.The underwriting of employment by the government, either through
armaments or public works.
5.The underwriting of social security by the government – old-age
pensions, mothers’ pensions, unemployment insurance, and the like.
6.The underwriting of food, housing, and medical care, by the
government.
7.The use of deficit spending to finance these underwritings.
8.The abandonment of gold in favor of managed currencies.
9.The control of foreign trade by the government.
10.The control of natural resources.
11.The control of energy sources.
12.The control of transportation.
13.The control of agricultural production.
14.The control of labor organizations.
15.The enlistment of young men and women in youth corps devoted to
health, discipline, community service and ideologies consistent with
those of the authorities.
16.Heavy taxation, with special emphasis on the estates and incomes of
the rich.
17.Control of industry without ownership.
18.State control of communications and propaganda.
Perhaps the most egregious part of this movement has been the way in
which the government has become the Fabian Society in its deluding the
poor into believing they are the Savior of the poor while the plan all
along has been the fattening of the sheep to prepare society to accept
their annihilation so openly embraced by the likes of Shaw, Sanger and
others in the foundation of the Progressive movement.
We are on the precipice. Have you ever believed that the government
needs to step in and do something about the reckless morality of many
in our society who bear more children than they can support? Isn’t
this exactly one of the excuses used by Progressives embracing Pro-
Choice position to justify the wholesale slaughter of the most
innocent among us?
As we watch the downward spiraling of our economy, would we justify
purging those who contribute less or nothing by our estimation in
order to preserve our own existence?
This has been the trail of the Fabian turtle in its slow path towards
The Doctrine of Inevability of Gradulaism. The journey of this turtle
does not end with the surrender of moral values and replacing them
with Fabian intellectualism in America. The turtles journey ends when
this is the rule for the world and this can only be accomplished by
the fundamental transformation of America.
The most dangerous things to human sanctity is that Progressives
believe this is compassion. Their understanding about compassion is
vastly different from our own but to help us all understand how they
define compassion consider this quote in 2010 for progressive author
and commentator Virginia Ironside
“If a baby’s going to be born severely disabled or totally unwanted,
surely an abortion is the act of a loving mother. If I were the mother
of a suffering child – I mean a deeply suffering child – I would be
the first to want to put a pillow over its face…My feeling of horror
at suffering is much greater than getting rid of a couple of cells. If
it was a child I really loved, who was in agony, I think any good
mother would.”
That, my friends is Progressive compassion. “My Feeling of horror at
suffering is much greater than getting rid of a couple of cells.”
